Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 04:49:53 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191674] Implementation for "%tu" printf(3) qualifier incorrect on several 32-bit architectures (arm/x86/mips, i.e. when sizeof(ptrdiff_t) != sizeof(*intmax_t)) Message-ID: <bug-191674-8-hzvYmEJ9e1@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191674-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191674-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191674 --- Comment #4 from commit-hook@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: ngie Date: Tue Feb 14 04:49:24 UTC 2017 New revision: 313723 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/313723 Log: MFC r313378,r313379: r313378: Wrap strcmp/wcscmp calls with ATF_CHECK_MSG and drop atf_tc_fail use The reasoning here was the same as what was done in r313376: - Gather as many results as possible instead of failing early and not testing the rest of the cases. - Simplify logic when checking test inputs vs outputs and printing test result. r313379: Expect :int_within_limits to fail when ptrdiff_t/*intmax_t differ in base type The %t{d,u} (ptrdiff_t) tests fail for the following reasons: - ptrdiff_t is by definition int32_t on !LP64 architectures and int64_t on LP64 architectures. - intmax_t is by definition fixed to int64_t on all architectures. - Some of the code in lib/libc/stdio/... is promoting ptrdiff_t to *intma= x_t when parsing/representing the value. PR: 191674 Changes: _U stable/10/ stable/10/lib/libc/tests/stdio/printbasic_test.c --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191674-8-hzvYmEJ9e1>