Date: 24 Oct 2001 19:52:26 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> Subject: Re: "types" man page Message-ID: <xzpadyhylgl.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.011024095346.jhb@FreeBSD.org> References: <XFMail.011024095346.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes: > On 24-Oct-01 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> writes: > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 06:43:19PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > > 2) in what section would such a man page belong? > > > 7 or 9? > > It's definitely not kernel-only, so I don't think 9 is appropriate; 7 > > would be a last resort if we can't think of anything better. > 7 is good to me it seems. See operator(7), ascii(7), etc. Right. What do we do with types(5)? Leave it alone, nuke it, or repo-copy it to types(7)? (I don't see much point in the latter as there would be very little in common between the two) Ruslan, do you have a suggestion for the proper mdoc incantations for a types(7) entry, based on the items I listed in my original mail? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpadyhylgl.fsf>