Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 13:49:58 -0600 From: Chris Costello <chris@FreeBSD.ORG> To: Hiten Pandya <hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Should the stat(2) man page contain information on test macros Message-ID: <20020315134958.C82311@holly.calldei.com> In-Reply-To: <20020315194208.A25074@hpdi.ath.cx>; from hiten@uk.FreeBSD.org on Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 07:42:08PM %2B0000 References: <20020315194208.A25074@hpdi.ath.cx>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, March 15, 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote: > OK, is it a good idea, to have the S_IS* macros documented in the > stat(2) man page, or are they documented in the man pages (other > than stat(2)) already? :) Just cross-reference to a man page that has them. chmod(2) seems to be the most logical choice. -- +-------------------+--------------------------------------------+ | Chris Costello | Performance is easier to add than clarity. | | chris@FreeBSD.org | | +-------------------+--------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020315134958.C82311>