Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 May 2008 10:46:49 +0200
From:      "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com>
To:        "Paul Saab" <ps@mu.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Emil Mikulic <emikulic@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: ciss(4) not coping with large arrays?
Message-ID:  <b41c75520805160146j60a910e7k6a15f9c83bd6ace7@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5c0ff6a70805160103o75461976wce04f697975a176c@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20080516073932.GA39803@dmr.ath.cx> <b41c75520805160050l3c9acc4fx94bfabccb1f4d1d3@mail.gmail.com> <5c0ff6a70805160103o75461976wce04f697975a176c@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> In earlier releases (5 and 6 at least) you couldn't create partitions
>> larger than 2 TB. I don't know whether work has been to circumvent
>> this in 7 but tools like fsck has to be changed as well. Have you
>> tried zfs?
>
> zfs has nothing to do with this.  The driver is not properly dealing with
> the large volume.
> set the kernel tunable in loader.conf
> kern.cam.da.3.minimum_cmd_size=16
> kern.cam.da.4.minimum_cmd_size=16

Yes, of course. I was off-course. :-)

-- 
regards
Claus

When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom,
the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner.

Shakespeare



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520805160146j60a910e7k6a15f9c83bd6ace7>