Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Nov 2000 23:46:08 -0500 (EST)
From:      Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
Cc:        audit@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Solicitation for auditing process announcement
Message-ID:  <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001130234448.97425E-100000@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0011302018430.59011-100000@beppo.feral.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Matthew Jacob wrote:

> >indicating that audit@ is willing to do review-on-demand and should be
> 
> What does 'review on demand' mean?

It means that we're too laid back to have figured out rigorous, pro-active
re-auditing of the source tree, and instead we sit there and wait until
someone e-mails audit@ saying, ``I'm going to make the following stupid
changes to the following setuid binaries, could you take a look and OK
them before I drive-by commit them twenty minutes before the release?''

Robert N M Watson             FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
robert@fledge.watson.org      NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.NEB.3.96L.1001130234448.97425E-100000>