Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 22:15:35 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bzip2 (was cvs commit: ...) Message-ID: <20010206221535.D86851@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200102070201.f1721Pp56850@iguana.aciri.org>; from rizzo@aciri.org on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 06:01:25PM -0800 References: <200102070155.f171tTP58669@misha.privatelabs.com> <200102070201.f1721Pp56850@iguana.aciri.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 06:01:25PM -0800, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > My testing showed the opposite, actually. See: > > http://virtual-estates.net/bm/ > > not strange -- gzip is painfully slow if you run with -9 > but much faster than bzip2 when you use the default options. Uh... for compressing packages where we are trying to get the most on a CD disc, don't you think we'd use -9 ?????? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010206221535.D86851>