Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Mar 2009 12:58:06 -0700
From:      Andrew Thompson <thompsa@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
Cc:        Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r189594 - head
Message-ID:  <20090309195805.GA53225@citylink.fud.org.nz>
In-Reply-To: <20090309194338.GA48593@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
References:  <200903091922.n29JMjLR035306@svn.freebsd.org> <20090309194338.GA48593@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:43:38PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:22:45PM +0000, Stanislav Sedov wrote:
> > Author: stas
> > Date: Mon Mar  9 19:22:45 2009
> > New Revision: 189594
> > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/189594
> > 
> > Log:
> >   - Point libusb users to the ports collection UPDATING file.
> > 
> > Modified:
> >   head/UPDATING
> > 
> > Modified: head/UPDATING
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- head/UPDATING	Mon Mar  9 19:04:53 2009	(r189593)
> > +++ head/UPDATING	Mon Mar  9 19:22:45 2009	(r189594)
> > @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 8.
> >  	libusb20.so.1 is now installed as libusb.so.1 and the ports system
> >  	updated to use it. This requires a buildworld/installworld in order to
> >  	update the library and dependencies (usbconfig, etc). Its advisable to
> > -	update your ports as the affected programs have had a revision bump.
> > +	rebuid all ports which uses libusb. More specific directions are given
> > +	in the ports collection UPDATING file.
> >  
> 
> 1) 'rebuid' should be 'rebuild'
> 
> 2) There is no information in /usr/ports/UPDATING concerning
>    the problems caused by USB2.

Not sure if the problems you are referring to extend beyond your
previous mail about it being rushed, if so please advise.

While the merge hasnt been perfect it couldnt have really been done
differently due to finite resources and I dont believe it was
unreasonable for a change in HEAD.


cheers,
Andrew



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090309195805.GA53225>