Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 25 May 2000 09:35:02 -0700
From:      Randy Primeaux <randy@Cloudfactory.ORG>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: question about natd/ipfw 
Message-ID:  <200005251728.KAA07940@relay.ultimanet.com>
In-Reply-To: Message from Brian Hechinger <wonko@users.tmok.com>  of "Thu, 25 May 2000 11:26:25 EDT." <200005251526.LAA59553@entropy.tmok.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Did they delegate to you a single IP out of a /24, and a delegated /29 ?

If so, it sounds to me like the delegated the /29 CIDR block to you in
a way that you could connect their DSL bridge to your edge router,
then on the inside of your edge router would like the netblock, and
behind that would be second router running NAT.

DSL <->  static router <-/29-> NAT router <-> private LAN.

modem / cat5 / freebsd0 / hub0 / freebsd1 / hub1 / other hosts

For reference of Variable Length Subnet Table, see rfc1878.


Brian Hechinger writes:
> NOTE: sorry for the cross-post, tell me which list is more appropriate and i'
> ll
>       drop the other one.
> 
> a freebsd user has been helping me with this, but this is out of his realm of
> experience.  i am setting up a NAT box/router for my Covad/DCA Net DSL link.
> 
> i will have two sets of outside IP addresses, a single IP address that will b
> e
> bound to my outside interface which comes from covad, and a /29 block from
> DCA Net.  the /29 will be routed through the outside interface into the NAT
> box, and from there i want to be able to use them as an "outside NAT pool"
> externally they will just look like an average domain, but that i will be abl
> e
> to redirect as i please internally.
> 
> so, my question is: what do i do with the /29?  do i create aliases on my 
> outside interface for them all?  do i create aliases on my inside interface 
> for them all?  do i bind them to lo0? attatching them to the outside interfac
> e
> seems wrong to me as well as attatching them to the inside interface since
> they should be listened to on either interface, hence my thought to bind them
> to the loopback device since i view these things as being "virtual"
> 
> ipfw: using NAT and firewall_type="open" NAT blocks all non-redirected traffi
> c?
> 
> 
> thanks,
> 
> -brian
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message

--
Randy Primeaux
randy@cloudfactory.org         http://cloudfactory.org/~randy/
tranze@hyperreal.org		http://hyperreal.org/~tranze/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005251728.KAA07940>