Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 02:14:59 +0000 From: Ben Morrow <ben@morrow.me.uk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Musings on ZFS Backup strategies Message-ID: <20130302021452.GA30814@anubis.morrow.me.uk> In-Reply-To: <442EA027-6D73-4D85-AD73-1E29DC836EF6@ee.ryerson.ca> References: <20130301165040.GA26251@anubis.morrow.me.uk> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1303011209321.2046@sea.ntplx.net> <20130301192949.GB79829@neutralgood.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1303011538560.2804@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Quoth David Magda <dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca>: > On Mar 1, 2013, at 15:39, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, kpneal@pobox.com wrote: > > > >> What about extended attributes? ACLs? Are those saved by tar? > > > > I think tar (as root or -p) will attempt to preserve those. > > Specifically bsdtar (with libarchive) and star: > > https://github.com/libarchive/libarchive/wiki/TarPosix1eACLs But since ZFS doesn't support POSIX.1e ACLs that's not terribly useful... I don't believe bsdtar/libarchive supports NFSv4 ACLs yet. Ben
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130302021452.GA30814>