Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 18:53:00 +0700 From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Paolo Pisati <flag@libero.it> Cc: FreeBSD_Net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Differences between netgraph nodes in 4.x and 5.x' Message-ID: <20030729115300.GA85370@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org> References: <20030728224737.GA47439@newluxor.skynet.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307281905130.8223-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030729103042.GA230@newluxor.skynet.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 12:30:42PM +0200, Paolo Pisati wrote: > And while you are listening, i can show u something else... =) > > I have NETGRAPH in my kernel, and this is what i get when i > try to load ng_ether the first time: > > [root@newluxor root]# kldload ng_ether > module_register: module netgraph already exists! > linker_file_sysinit "netgraph.ko" failed to register! 17 > kldload: can't load ng_ether: Exec format error > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > it fails to load the node... yes, kernel loader in RELENG_4 fails when some of the dependancies are linked into the kernel. > [root@newluxor root]# kldload ng_ether > > while the second time it works... =O > > [root@newluxor root]# kldunload ng_ether > kldunload: can't unload file: Device busy > > and if i try to unload it, it always says that it's busy: > i think this is due to the inability to delete > an interface, isn't it? /fjoe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030729115300.GA85370>