Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2002 12:46:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira <lioux@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>, portmgr@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [PATCH] PTHREAD_CFLAGS/LIBS on sparc64 Message-ID: <20021203204611.GA38099@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20021203155143.22703.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> References: <20021127155317.GG375@straylight.oblivion.bg> <20021203155143.22703.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 01:51:21PM -0200, Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira wrote: > Well, I apologize if I say something stupid but if a port requires > pthread support... not linking against it won't make the port work. It might > not even get the port to compile. > Wouldn't be better if a stub (with no internal code) version > of libc_r was cooked specially for sparc64? Just to see if the ports > build in that ARCH? Since nothing will really work until we have a > working thread implemention for sparc64. I think we can just let them fail for now, unless they have a switch that lets them build w/o threads support. Kris --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE97RgTWry0BWjoQKURAtTRAKDtdGyWHJdlXg8iANnBdcTCQB8itACg0yUp WczVrFsulivHj9s09fNFt/U= =dzfa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SLDf9lqlvOQaIe6s-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021203204611.GA38099>