Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 09:40:02 -0500 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@freebsd.org> Cc: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r276008 - in head/sys: kern sys Message-ID: <201412220940.02509.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <5496F37D.5030903@FreeBSD.org> References: <201412211332.sBLDW8VC030548@svn.freebsd.org> <20141221151425.GX2148@kib.kiev.ua> <5496F37D.5030903@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, December 21, 2014 11:21:17 am Andriy Gapon wrote: > On 21/12/2014 17:14, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 04:45:28PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> On 21/12/2014 16:41, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > >>> Or, are you asking why caching of the name could be needed for > >>> core dump files at all ? > >> > >> Sort of. Why VN_OPEN_NAMECACHE is useful in the case of core dumps? > >> What does it make better? > > The vn_fullpath() mostly works for the core files after the change, > > comparing with the non-working state at all before. > > > > Ah, vn_fullpath(). Thank you. Is there something specific to core dumps that makes vn_fullpath() more useful to have working before a process tries to open the core? (As compared to other newly-created files) -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201412220940.02509.jhb>