Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2020 15:37:16 -0700 From: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recognizing Matrix as an official channel Message-ID: <20200817153716.6055f449@bigus.dream-tech.com> In-Reply-To: <2lg17p.qf88qe.1hgf02e-qmf@ms-10.1blu.de> References: <r4i3f1onokd4lq5igh8705mt.1597640015532@email.lge.com> <0220573d-7844-4c0f-9cff-56c2a6f91500@www.fastmail.com> <b6a282b8-79e0-42d9-c662-f00d5876da53@grosbein.net> <2lg17p.qf88qe.1hgf02e-qmf@ms-10.1blu.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:23:01 +0000 Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote: > Why we would need this at all? Aren't mailing lists with archives not good > enough, or even better? Perhaps. However it's not a question of whether we need this or not or the relative utility of communication fora. There already exists one active channel and it does get used. I think the OP just wants an official stamp of approval and maybe a blurb on the webpage pointing to the channel. As for myself, approval is irrelevant to utility. > matthias (FreeBSD since 2.2.7) Since 2.0 here. :) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>>> *The opinions expressed above are entirely my own* <<<< One of the big differences between questions and answers is that a question may be asked at almost any time, but its answer may only come at a special time and place.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200817153716.6055f449>