Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:53:38 -0500
From:      "Troy Settle" <troy@psknet.com>
To:        <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: tinydns
Message-ID:  <BFEGKDHLHDNOJEIHJDBAMECICBAA.troy@psknet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010227221428.E3E8F37B71A@hub.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

$ named -v
named 8.2.3-T5B Mon Sep  4 09:30:22 EDT 2000
        root@build.psknet.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named

I'm updating now.  I guess we'll see how it goes from here.


--
  Troy Settle
  Pulaski Networks
  540.994.4254

It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short



** -----Original Message-----
** From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
** [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Simon
** Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 5:18 PM
** To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
** Subject: RE: tinydns
**
**
**
** what does named -v return? i had constant random segfaults until
** i upgraded to 8.2.3-REL
**
** -Simon
**
** On Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:08:55 -0500, Troy Settle wrote:
**
** >
** >I don't know, perhaps it's the fact that it's the only daemon
** that's dumping
** >core (sig 11) on a fairly unloaded server.  When I posted earlier today,
** >it's done it twice in a week, it dumped again this afternoon.
** I'm running
** >8.2.3, and that's teh current "stable" version listed on ISC's web site.
** >
** >I appreciate that BIND is used by hundreds of thousands (if not
** millions) of
** >networks around the world, but it's been less than reliable
** here.  I've been
** >using various versions of BIND for some 6 years now, and I've
** never seen it
** >behave like this.  In addition to that, if one is to believe
** the security
** >warnings, everything before 8.2.3 has holes in it, and just
** because one's
** >not been found, doesn't mean that 8.2.3 doesn't have one either.
** >
** >--
** >  Troy Settle
** >  Pulaski Networks
** >  540.994.4254
** >
** >It's always a long day, 86400 doesn't fit into a short
** >
** >
** >
** >** -----Original Message-----
** >** From: Leif Neland [mailto:leifn@neland.dk]
** >** Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2001 4:57 PM
** >** To: Troy Settle
** >** Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
** >** Subject: Re: tinydns
** >**
** >**
** >**
** >**
** >** On Tue, 27 Feb 2001, Troy Settle wrote:
** >**
** >** > BIND is not an option here, I've been using it for years, and
** >** it's taken a
** >** > while, but it's proved itself completely unreliable to me.
** >** >
** >** Not to offend you, but what makes you so special so you are
** incompatible
** >** with BIND? I've had no problems which weren't my own faults.
** >**
** >** The only trouble has been somebody appearently has taken fun
** in killing
** >** bind's around here, which I haven't gotten around to upgrading to the
** >** latest version...
** >**
** >** Leif
** >**
** >**
** >**
** >
** >
** >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
** >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
** >
**
**
**
**
** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
** with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
**
**


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BFEGKDHLHDNOJEIHJDBAMECICBAA.troy>