Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Dec 2006 02:28:29 -0500
From:      Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Micah <micahjon@ywave.com>
Cc:        gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ports/105589: Firefox 2.0 segfaults when saving more than one file per session
Message-ID:  <1165476509.74826.14.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <200612061930.kB6JUJVA038980@freefall.freebsd.org>
References:  <200612061930.kB6JUJVA038980@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--=-y4yV1ZiN5baoGC3ikevU
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 19:30 +0000, Micah wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR ports/105589; it has been noted by GNA=
TS.
>=20
> From: Micah <micahjon@ywave.com>
> To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
> Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports/105589: Firefox 2.0 segfaults when saving more than on=
e
>  file per session
> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 11:04:22 -0800
>=20
>  Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>  > I still can't reproduce it. I think, it might be something in the=20
>  > between of KDE vs libgnome or something else. Perhaps, you can try to=20
>  > run "/usr/local/libexec/gnome-settings-daemon &" before you run firefo=
x=20
>  > in KDE to see if it will help. It doesn't make any sense to me, becaus=
e=20
>  > there is no problem in Fluxbox.
>  >=20
>  > Cheers,
>  > Mezz
> =20
>  Any hope of getting this bug reopened? There are now more people
>  reporting it and more backtraces to examine.
> =20
>  I've followed the execution through kdbg and Firefox segfaults when
>  executing line 583 of mozilla/widget/src/gtk2/nsFilePicker.cpp:
> =20
>  gint response =3D gtk_dialog_run (GTK_DIALOG (file_chooser));
> =20
>  Indicating it's either a GTK bug or Firefox isn't prepping the
>  file_chooser properly. I haven't been able to follow the execution past
>  that point (not sure how to setup my environment for that). Since the
>  problems cropped up in thunderbird and firefox after the gnome upgrade,
>  it's probably a mozilla/gtk incompatibility. BTW, before the segfault=20
>  the debugger shows my stacktrace as being the same (up-to that point) as=
=20
>  the ones Indigo posted, but after the segfault the trace is shorter -=20
>  probably means the stack is getting trashed by the bug.
> =20
>  I tried to test the uninstall libgnome fix to see how it's affecting=20
>  firefox. Running firefox without libgnome causes libimgicon.so and=20
>  libmozgnome.so to fail to load. I removed first alternately then both=20
>  libimgicon and libmozgnome while libgnome was still installed, but=20
>  firefox still crashed, so the problem is not in either of those librarie=
s.
> =20
>  Debian /may/ be seeing a similar bug, but I couldn't find any followup
>  info on it: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D399406
> =20
>  Lastly, I'm almost done doing a portupgrade -af just in case there's=20
>  something wrong with the /usr/ports/UPDATING instructions for the gnome=20
>  upgrade. The majority of software has been rebuilt - but firefox still=20
>  shows the bug. There's not much else I can do without help from someone=20
>  more knowledgeable in firefox/gtk.

Before anything can be done to fix this, someone needs to provide a
backtrace with full debugging symbols.  For more on doing this, see
http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/bugging.html .

Joe

--=20
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc

--=-y4yV1ZiN5baoGC3ikevU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBFd8Kdb2iPiv4Uz4cRAgFfAJ9BrBz8KtrbMyckNUG3debpdE7djACgjK0i
ijmRKQt114IRJtEDvkmbJ30=
=lwVX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-y4yV1ZiN5baoGC3ikevU--




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1165476509.74826.14.camel>