Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 09:49:16 +0900 (JST) From: Maho NAKATA <maho@FreeBSD.org> To: lists@eitanadler.com Cc: pfg@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel Message-ID: <20120118.094916.733931611563135291.maho@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAF6rxgm4fCyJc80sy-xNZ0q9iUSRbRJLn6YbWS_A-Gg6QxJyVg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120117092409.GH4729@azathoth.lan> <1326814752.93513.YahooMailClassic@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <CAF6rxgm4fCyJc80sy-xNZ0q9iUSRbRJLn6YbWS_A-Gg6QxJyVg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi all,
Many thanks for discussion.
It looks all understands adding "apache" makes sense.
However, PKGNAMEPREFIX is defined as ${LANG_PKGNAME}, and PKGNAMESUFFIX is
defined as ${LANG_SUFFIX} therefore, English and Japanese version
should be something like:
en-openoffice-3-devel_US
and
ja-openoffice-3-devel_JP
.
Adding apache looks long.
en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
ja-apache-openoffice-3-devel_JP
In my opinion, choosing politically correct one is good.
so let's have a ballot;
1. en-openoffice-3-devel_US
2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
for me,
2. en-apache-openoffice-3-devel_US
thanks
From: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>
Subject: Re: Fw: ports/164230: repocopy request: editors/openoffice.org-3-devel to editors/apache-openoffice-3-devel
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:48:55 -0500
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>> Adding the Apache name to the brand is the standard Apache
>> policy and in the ports tree we already have more that
>> 50 ports for apache projects using the "Apache" name.
>
> devel/subversion ?
> java/axis2 ?
>
> It may make sense to add apache to PKGNAMEPREFIX but please don't move the port.
>
>
> --
> Eitan Adler
>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120118.094916.733931611563135291.maho>