Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 22:43:00 +0200 From: Marius Strobl <marius@alchemy.franken.de> To: Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com> Cc: Tim Nelson <tnelson@fudnet.dyndns.org>, Kage <jirokagey@hotmail.com>, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gem0 frame error Message-ID: <20080624204300.GA17358@alchemy.franken.de> In-Reply-To: <20080623235653.GC55552@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <18034453.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> <485FCBD1.8020807@fudnet.net> <20080623235653.GC55552@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:56:53AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:14:09AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote: > > Kage wrote: > > > > > >Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > >>With what version of FreeBSD is this? > > >> > > >>Marius > > >> > > >>_______________________________________________ > > >>freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list > > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 > > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > >I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn > > >about > > >systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this > > >system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT > > >half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I > > >checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I > > >have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT. > > >Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good > > >switch fixed the problem completely. > > > > > >At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help! > > > > > >(It is 7.0-release, by the way) > > > > > Regardless... shouldn't the driver properly deal with being plugged into > > a 10BT Half-Duplex environment? > > Yes, it should. At least we know there is an issue on 10Mbps link > with gem(4). Marius may have better idea as he touched gem(4) > recently. > Chances are that half-duplex support was broken before if_gem.c 1.44/ 172334. That's why I asked for the FreeBSD version this is happening with. Marius
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080624204300.GA17358>