Date: Tue, 14 Apr 1998 12:16:28 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@ucb.crimea.ua> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /etc/rc.local vs. /usr/local/etc/rc.d vs. ??? Message-ID: <19980414121628.09869@ucb.crimea.ua> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980414105732.6716A-100000@zerium.newmedia.no>; from Hans Petter Bieker on Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 10:58:23AM %2B0200 References: <19980414013359.26683@ucb.crimea.ua> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980414105732.6716A-100000@zerium.newmedia.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 14, 1998 at 10:58:23AM +0200, Hans Petter Bieker wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Apr 1998, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > local_startup="/usr/local/etc/rc.d /usr/local/etc/rc.d/${hostname} /usr/X11R6/etc/rc.d"
>
> what's wrong with /etc/rc.d ?
There is no such directory - /etc/rc.d ;-)
Did you read the original message?
He has a couple of machines that NFS-share a single /usr/local.
When these machines boot up, they all run staff from /usr/local/rc.d.
It is a side effect.
I offer the solution: to have a separate subdirectory for each machine.
Than in /usr/local/rc.d can be placed common scripts for all machines.
--
Ruslan Ermilov System Administrator
ru@ucb.crimea.ua United Commercial Bank
+380-652-247647 Simferopol, Crimea
2426679 ICQ Network, UIN
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980414121628.09869>