Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 07:22:58 -0700 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...? Message-ID: <20031001142258.GA37336@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20031001131926.2a590638.Alexander@Leidinger.net> References: <20030930221148.54E7E5D07@ptavv.es.net> <20030930194544.H94686@ganymede.hub.org> <20031001010119.M592@korben.in.tern> <20030930232506.GA31027@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20031001131926.2a590638.Alexander@Leidinger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 01:19:26PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:25:06 -0700 > Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > > > As soon as Kirk committed the snapshot capability, snapshot became available > > on UFS1. The only requirement is softupdates and softupdates pre-dates > > UFS2. > > Snapshots are available in 4.9? I thought it's not only about the FS > structure, it's about the code in -current (which is much different from > the 4.x code). > I wrote snapshots require softupdates. How you jumped to the conclusion that 4.x has snapshots is beyond me. My truck has a 4-speed manual transmission, therefore all trucks have 4-speed manual transmissions. -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031001142258.GA37336>