Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 01:51:40 +1100 (EST) From: Mark Russell <freebsd@mark.net.au> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: portmgr@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: INDEX[-5] files were removed from CVS. Message-ID: <20041114014750.K60099@juana.isp.net.au> In-Reply-To: <41961E2F.20008@gmx.net> References: <20041113101925.GB70256@voodoo.oberon.net> <20041114003532.L60099@juana.isp.net.au> <20041114012609.B60099@juana.isp.net.au> <41961E2F.20008@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Mark Russell wrote: > >> I have seen no discussion on it can you point me to the thread in the lists >> please > > It has been discussed on a non-public list. In any case, there's no point in > rehashing the discussion now, you can solve your immediate problem by > overriding INDEXFILE yourself. So major changes to 2 stable branches have been discussed in non public lists and non gives a hoot on the effects on how it effects the general userbase? I'm sorry I would like this thing roled back and discussed in public, its really really broken shit for alot of machines I admin without even a RFC, this is a stupid thing to happen. > > -- Security Level: Paranoid, Maximum, Medium, Low, RedHat, Windows.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041114014750.K60099>