Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 16 Jul 2005 23:12:18 -0500
From:      Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu>
To:        Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New port problems
Message-ID:  <3EC902FB8A21C5DB6EC624F0@Paul-Schmehls-Computer.local>
In-Reply-To: <20050715222707.GE337@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
References:  <E792C03474FB520A8C0A3D66@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <20050715222707.GE337@odin.ac.hmc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On July 15, 2005 3:27:07 PM -0700 Brooks Davis 
<brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 04:28:27PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
>> I'm working on a new port.  This port needs to grab a tar.gz file, unzip
>> it  and then copy two files to the right directories (one to
>> /usr/local/bin,  the other to /usr/local/etc) and put the docs in the
>> right dir.
>>
>> So, I'm using NO_BUILD=        yes
>>
>> But, when I try to install the port, I get the error "make: cannot open
>> Makefile.
>> *** Error code 2".  Obviously, the port is still trying to compile from
>> source, even though I've used NO_BUILD.  Is there a trick I'm missing?
>> Is  there a specific order that NO_BUILD needs to appear in, in the
>> Makefile?
>>
>> Here's the entire Makefile, if that helps.  (The LIB_DEPENDS line is
>> commented out because, right now, the tclX port doesn't build, so I have
>> to  test without it for now):
>>
>
> Here's your problem:
>
>> post-install:
>>        ${INSTALL_SCRIPT} -m 751 ${WRKSRC}/client/sguil.tk
> ...
>
> you need to set do-install if you don't want the system attempt to
> perform a "make install".
>
Thank you.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EC902FB8A21C5DB6EC624F0>