Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:28:32 -0500 From: "Robin P. Blanchard" <robin.blanchard@gactr.uga.edu> To: <current@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: AAC vs AMR vs getblk [Re: Processes blocked on getblk or ufs] Message-ID: <EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDEB5@EBE1.gc.nat>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'm finally catching up on this thread after a busy couple of=20 > weeks where I wasn't reading much list email. There seems to=20 > be two problem areas in the thread, AAC and AMR. For the AAC=20 > problems, I've put a work-around in place until I find the=20 > root cause. The work-around appears to work well; I can no=20 > longer reproduce the problem where I could eadily reproduce=20 > it before, at the cost of reducing the command pool from 512=20 > to 504. Not a big hit overall, and I'll hopefully find the=20 > real fix this weekend. >=20 > Since I can't always read list email in detail, please please=20 > please email me directly if you have problems that might be=20 > related to aac. You'll have a much higher chance of catching=20 > my attention if you do that. >=20 > For AMR, it looks like there is indeed a real problem, but=20 > the driver is basically without a maintainer at this point. =20 > I don't have the time right now to learn it in enough detail=20 > to be useful. Thanks for the time and effort put into this! My dual 2650 is no longer exhibiting any getblk issues. I would definitely encourage this being back-ported to 5.2-rel or 5.2.1-rel. --------------------------------------- Robin P. Blanchard Systems Integration Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Education fon: 706.542.2404 < > fax: 706.542.6546 ---------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?EE3D3FBAFFCAED448C21C398FDAD91AC013BDEB5>