Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:27:56 +0000
From:      "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>
To:        Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
Cc:        Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, Alfred Perlstein <alfred@FreeBSD.org>, "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com>, Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org>, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>, Kurt Jaeger <lists@c0mplx.org>, Devin Teske <dteske@freebsd.org>, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: BIND segway -> python -> first-class ports
Message-ID:  <E96D3049-20F3-4282-9AC0-DE5269385F9F@fisglobal.com>
In-Reply-To: <7271C4C4-7BAB-4DA7-9E10-49D5B2DB8964@mu.org>
References:  <mailman.313.1386119137.1390.freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> <529E8C53.6020208@freebsd.org> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1312032238220.15897@sea.ntplx.net> <20131204060246.GV2951@home.opsec.eu> <CAN6yY1udd1GbQVK4YR-yxNe7vqX3S1refQwch2cafRnMv=W4mA@mail.gmail.com> <CAFHbX1K1AgZ4FaEjP_vvnfiwDWsj6M3ysEVn4taX_4_p%2B1Z8Nw@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1tjS=uk1Qr-sBN0PT73xpP%2BBxL8wLt9aosYfWf751rC5A@mail.gmail.com> <52A12843.3010204@freebsd.org> <0BFC927B-D72E-4926-BB3D-2C000F310BDD@fisglobal.com> <7271C4C4-7BAB-4DA7-9E10-49D5B2DB8964@mu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Dec 8, 2013, at 11:02 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:

>=20
>> On Dec 8, 2013, at 10:32 AM, "Teske, Devin" <Devin.Teske@fisglobal.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>=20
>>> On Dec 5, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>> On 12/5/13, 4:39 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:17 AM, Tom Evans <tevans.uk@googlemail.com> =
wrote:
>>>>>=20
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>>>> Of course, the question of what needs to be a class 1 port may prove=
 to
>>>>> be
>>>>>> the bikeshed to end all bikesheds! (I think we need Python, Perl, JP=
EG,
>>>>>> PNG, GPG, BIND and bright yellow!) And we need a reasonable mechanis=
m to
>>>>>> update this list as the popularity of various tools does change.
>>>>> Woah, this is missing most of what Alfred was saying. There should be
>>>>> no "class 1 ports", and if jpeg went in base, it should be because
>>>>> base requires and uses it, not because it is useful to 3rd party
>>>>> software in base. The base jpeg *would not* even be visible to
>>>>> ports/3rd party software by default, only to base and things
>>>>> especially configured to use base.
>>>>>=20
>>>>> You are correct. I did not understand Alfred's proposal correctly.  Of
>>>> course, I can see several issues with that, as well, but it' a lot more
>>>> tractable than a set of "baseline" ports.
>>> Tom hit the nail on the head and perfectly described the proposal. Than=
k you Tom.  Kevin, thanks for being open to the idea.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> My hope is that it allows us to build richer system.  For instance, go =
look at portsnap(1), it's written in sh(1) and due to that it's pretty slow
>>=20
>> Perhaps bsdconfig is the exception to that rule (and can lend a hand).
>> I designed bsdconfig to run fast under double-emulation...
>>=20
>> + Running under qemu, while...
>> + Qemu is running inside a VM, wile...
>> + VM has only 1 CPU and 128MB RAM, with minimal disk space, while...
>> + VM is running on a 8 year old laptop
>>=20
>> The idea is that... if you develop for the worst of environments... you'=
ll get
>> screamin' performance on modern hardware.
>>=20
>> In my emulation environment... a single fork is very costly.
>>=20
>> So...
>>=20
>> Does portsnap need some work? is that what I'm hearing? (smiles)
>=20
> My take is that you are a very talented person who shouldn't be spending =
time micro optimizing shell code and instead be granted a language that mak=
es writing such tools more efficiently easier.=20
>=20
> So if I were going to task the talented Devin Teske with something, remem=
ber you just asked my opinion, then it would be to look at putting Lua in t=
he boot loader, getting python into base, or working on making our utilitie=
s be able to output standard machine readable formats such as yaml, XML and=
 json.=20=20
>=20

My opinion is one of...

+ I get to work with an amazing team
+ I love to please

So if that's the consenting direction, I'll go that route ;D

I can see the value-add in all of those things. My only fear is recoil (so =
perhaps
a test bed of FreeNAS to show those things are of great value once added).
--=20
Devin

_____________
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidentia=
l. If you are not the intended recipient, please: (i) delete the message an=
d all copies; (ii) do not disclose, distribute or use the message in any ma=
nner; and (iii) notify the sender immediately. In addition, please be aware=
 that any message addressed to our domain is subject to archiving and revie=
w by persons other than the intended recipient. Thank you.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E96D3049-20F3-4282-9AC0-DE5269385F9F>