Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 Jul 1999 20:46:22 +0200
From:      Phil Regnauld <regnauld@ftf.net>
To:        David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Cc:        chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Known MMAP() race conditions ... ?
Message-ID:  <19990714204622.17443@ns.int.ftf.net>
In-Reply-To: <000001bece26$72d03780$021d85d1@youwant.to>; from David Schwartz on Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 11:26:54AM -0700
References:  <19990714203806.46887@ns.int.ftf.net> <000001bece26$72d03780$021d85d1@youwant.to>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
David Schwartz writes:
> >
> > 	Doesn't beat other LFSes.  And what is it good at ?
> > Integrity ?  Fragmentation (hah!)
> > 	Performance ?
> 
> 	Agreed. The question was not "what does NT do better than every UNIX". It
> was "what does NT do better than any UNIX". One other nice thing about NTFS

	And again, XFS exists for UNIX, Softupdates will soon allow no-fsck operation...

> (although certainly not unique) is that you can defragement it while it's
> operating.

	FFS is even better: it doesn't fragment.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990714204622.17443>