Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:13:05 +0200 From: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Alexander Best <alexbestms@wwu.de> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386_set_ioperm(2)/i386_get_ioperm(2) replacement after switch from x86 to amd64 Message-ID: <20091201141305.GZ2368@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> In-Reply-To: <permail-20091201132223f7e55a9d00002eca-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de> References: <permail-20091201132223f7e55a9d00002eca-a_best01@message-id.uni-muenster.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dwN3S3mscniL3FCL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 02:22:23PM +0100, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, >=20 > i recently switch from x86 to amd64. right now i'm looking for a way to > replace i386_set_ioperm(2) and i386_get_ioperm(2) (which are x86 specific= ). > any suggestions? >=20 > * full /dev/io access is rather nasty > * the app i'm developing is using inb/outb opcodes through inline assembl= y in > order to access the parallel port. i tried using ppi(4), but that slows d= own > things dramatically (see: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2009-July/029188.html) FreeBSD 8.0 supports these syscalls on amd64. --dwN3S3mscniL3FCL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksVJHAACgkQC3+MBN1Mb4ilsQCggdsHwU253GWeJolwbhwpxBr4 7FUAn3mMKBXE+93gv/FM1eafLNLceaBY =e4n8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dwN3S3mscniL3FCL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20091201141305.GZ2368>