Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 16:38:02 +0200 From: Clement Laforet <sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE set together? Message-ID: <20040604163802.6bbd4b16.sheepkiller@cultdeadsheep.org> In-Reply-To: <20040604142439.GA25434@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20040604142439.GA25434@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Signature=_Fri__4_Jun_2004_16_38_02_+0200_1nH3yjZzK2=oWM/W
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 18:24:40 +0400
Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Is it all right to set both NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for a port
> to indicate that mirroring the original distfiles is the only thing
> allowed by the license?
AFAIK, NO_PACKAGE implies NO_CDROM.
Use:
NO_PACKAGES: when you can't distribute a binary and/or a modified
version
NO_CDROM: when commercial-related distribution is prohibited
RESTRICTED: when we can't mirror the distfile and more, or you're unsure
about the license
clem
--Signature=_Fri__4_Jun_2004_16_38_02_+0200_1nH3yjZzK2=oWM/W
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAwIlKsRhfjwcjuh0RAlocAJ4iYw/j9QZUNod+pPtNaZ5CdZKTlACgra7n
N6uiQMVf2qZvmQL6e/7YEjE=
=ZXCp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Signature=_Fri__4_Jun_2004_16_38_02_+0200_1nH3yjZzK2=oWM/W--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040604163802.6bbd4b16.sheepkiller>