Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 19:50:51 +0100 From: Anders Nordby <anders@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> Cc: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>, sam@errno.com, mux@FreeBSD.ORG, obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ipfw userland breaks again. Message-ID: <20021215185051.GA55072@totem.fix.no> In-Reply-To: <200212151826.gBFIQMpo081407@apollo.backplane.com> References: <200212142351.gBENpBVH002931@apollo.backplane.com> <23f401c2a3ce$2a6e7e30$52557f42@errno.com> <200212150015.gBF0FlbS066547@apollo.backplane.com> <20021215.111441.05985858.imp@bsdimp.com> <200212151826.gBFIQMpo081407@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On Sun, Dec 15, 2002 at 10:26:22AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote: > This is complete BULLSHIT, Warner. This patch exists precisely so > the firewall can be turned on in secure mode. It does not make it > any easier to turn off then adding a rule: > > ipfw add 2 allow all from any to any > > So don't give me this bullshit about the patch being a security issue. > YOU KNOW IT ISN'T. > > Now you are forcing me to go to core. It's absolutely ridiculous and > you know it. Goddamn it, next time I won't even bother posting if all > I get is this sort of crap. How about sending the patch to the Technical Review Board, trb@ instead. Thanks. Cheers, -- Anders. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021215185051.GA55072>