Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 05 May 2007 06:18:51 +0200
From:      Attilio Rao <attilio@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Harald Schmalzbauer <h.schmalzbauer@omnisec.de>
Subject:   Re: PANIC: blockable slep lock (sx) msi @ ....msi.c:374
Message-ID:  <463C05AB.3050307@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <463B9268.1040305@samsco.org>
References:  <463B7A1D.6020602@omnisec.de> <463BF1A7.1050504@FreeBSD.org> <463B9268.1040305@samsco.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long wrote:
> The real problem is that infrastructure code like MSI should not hold 
> locks across calls to consumer code.  That's what needs to be fixed, not
> hacks to WITNESS.

Actually, I think nobody proposed to hack WITNESS, mine was just a 
question about a related topic.
I'm still trying to figure out why msi currently uses an sx (I suspect 
there are some sleeping point).

Attilio




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463C05AB.3050307>