Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 14 Mar 2003 19:15:46 +0100
From:      Maxime Henrion <mux@freebsd.org>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: WARNS=6 changes
Message-ID:  <20030314181546.GH3819@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030314175814.GC94719@sunbay.com>
References:  <20030313192045.GG3819@elvis.mu.org> <20030314175814.GC94719@sunbay.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:20:45PM +0100, Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > 	Hi all,
> > 
> > 
> > I've been told it would be good to post this change here for discussion,
> > so here it is.  This patch changes the default standard used for
> > warnings from c89 to c99.  It only affects WARNS=6 code (that is, very
> > few code).  It also makes it possible to select another standard with
> > the WSTD variable if we ever need to.  Of course, I've tested that no
> > parts of the build is broken with this patch.
> > 
> I think that *not* hard-coding WSTD is not good, because it then
> may mean different things for different settings.

I'm not sure I understand your concerns here.  Could you explain what
you mean a bit please?

Cheers,
Maxime

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030314181546.GH3819>