Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 09:57:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Mercer <jim@reptiles.org> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: kern/37635: USB ufm driver using major 200, although conf/majors lists 167 Message-ID: <200205011657.g41GvtX23772@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 37635 >Category: kern >Synopsis: USB ufm driver using major 200, although conf/majors lists 167 >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Wed May 01 10:00:02 PDT 2002 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Jim Mercer >Release: 4.x-stable >Organization: Reptilian Research >Environment: FreeBSD monitor.reptiles.org 4.5-STABLE FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #4: Wed Apr 24 12:38:56 EDT 2002 root@monitor.reptiles.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/REP-MON i386 >Description: the ufm driver appears to use major 200, which i guess was the number used for development. in /sys/conf/majors, it appears the ufm was assigned 167. i guess the core code wasn't updated to reflect the assignment. i manually did a mknod /dev/ufm0 c 200 0 and it works fine. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: edits: maybe: /sys/dev/usb/dsbr100io.h:#define FM_SET_FREQ _IOWR('U', 200, int) definitely: /sys/dev/usb/ufm.c:#define UFM_CDEV_MAJOR 200 useful: /dev/MAKEDEV >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200205011657.g41GvtX23772>