Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 17:05:51 -0700 From: Paul Allen <nospam@nospam.com> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>, Pascal Hofstee <caelian@gmail.com> Subject: Re: ZFS kernel panic Message-ID: <20070829000551.GC13200@hurl.ugcs.caltech.edu> In-Reply-To: <200708282324.05834.max@love2party.net> References: <20070828211440.470805B3B@mail.bitblocks.com> <200708282324.05834.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From Max Laier <max@love2party.net>, Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:23:56PM +0200: > drive with opened files into read-only mode, a panic is the only way to > make sure. No. The kernel may signal EIO to any subsequent operation. In addition even such aggressive action is not required, let alone a panic: UFS does not behave this way. Accesses to uncorrupted sections of a drive usually proceed normally. Please be careful with statements such as "the only way"--especially when the way you describe is demonstrably bad.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070829000551.GC13200>