Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 May 2008 18:18:46 -0400
From:      Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org>
To:        Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Testing lagg
Message-ID:  <20080529221846.GG1142@in-addr.com>
In-Reply-To: <483F1A8E.4070600@netfence.it>
References:  <483D7A22.9000206@netfence.it> <20080528154800.GF1142@in-addr.com> <483F1A8E.4070600@netfence.it>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 11:05:18PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> Gary Palmer ha scritto:
> 
> >Does the switch have spanning tree enabled?
> 
> Yes.
> Should it be?

It can be left on but if you can disable it on the ports that you
are using for lagg then that should help.  If you can't turn it off on
a per-port basis and you don't have a meshed switch topology then just
turn spanning tree off.  I think whats happening
is spanning tree is seeing a topology change and forcing a
renegotiation of the tree, which has the side effect of stopping
packet forwarding.  You could also turn down the spanning tree timers,
but there would still be a pause in the forwarding of packets

Regards,

Gary



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080529221846.GG1142>