Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 19:21:49 +0100 From: Ryan Hunt <ryan@ryanhunt.net> To: Aaron Glenn <aaron.glenn@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Jails Message-ID: <ECDBA198-149F-11D9-B6CE-000A95D35E66@ryanhunt.net> In-Reply-To: <18f60194041002111765f1ad8f@mail.gmail.com> References: <200410010543.42789.miha@ghuug.org> <415CFE85.8040005@kernel.ee> <200410010711.24829.miha@ghuug.org> <415D0977.4000006@kernel.ee> <8C51ED16-148D-11D9-8805-000A95D35E66@ryanhunt.net> <18f60194041002111765f1ad8f@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I'm running a box with 5.3-BETA6... I'm interested in 5.3 (which will be stable soon as you all know) as it has support for raw icmp access (whatever you call it, ping/traceroute/etc) and the possibility for multiple IP's. I'd also like to know the major changes in jail() from 4.x -> 5.x (The ability to ping for example) Thanks! Ryan. On 2 Oct 2004, at 19:17, Aaron Glenn wrote: > What branch of FreeBSD: 4.x or 5.x? > > > On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 17:10:16 +0100, Ryan Hunt <ryan@ryanhunt.net> wrote: >> Dear list, >> I was wondering if anyone knew of the best mailing list to be >> on for >> discussion of FreeBSD jails? >> >> I'm also wondering what people's suggestions would be running multiple >> Jails and handling partition resizing for the jails. (The jails would >> be resold to clients and they would be able to request more hard drive >> space) at this point the best solution would be to use 'vinum' but I'm >> not sure how appropriate it may be for Jails. >> >> Many thanks in advance! >> >> Ryan Hunt.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ECDBA198-149F-11D9-B6CE-000A95D35E66>