Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2014 12:25:16 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 195776] New: License clarification needed Message-ID: <bug-195776-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195776 Bug ID: 195776 Summary: License clarification needed Product: Ports Tree Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz CC: pfg@FreeBSD.org CC: pfg@FreeBSD.org graphics/simage This project is hosted at the same bitbucket account as graphics/Coin and contains the same copyright name but doesn't have the same BSD 3-clause LICENSE file. The main LICENSE file appears to be an MIT license but doesn't have the copyright notice paragraph, graphics/py-pivy from the same bitbucket account also uses the same LICENSE file and is considered MIT. Part of the simage code is covered by an MPEG Software Simulation Group license which I'm not certain of a match in the current license list. It contains the sentence "Commercial implementations of MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 video, including shareware, are subject to royalty fees to patent holders." https://bitbucket.org/Coin3D/simage/src/2c958a61ea8bdfb7f48bf079c899a52f7e92f33a/LICENSE.mpeg2enc?at=default I expect something like the following should be added to graphics/simage/Makefile LICENSE_COMB= dual LICENSE= MIT MPEG LICENSE_PERMS= no-dist-sell,no-pkg-sell --- Comment #1 from Bugzilla Automation <bugzilla@FreeBSD.org> --- Maintainers CC'd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-195776-13>