Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2009 16:50:05 +0200 From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r196818 - head/contrib/ee Message-ID: <20090904145005.GX2829@hoeg.nl> In-Reply-To: <20090904140219.GA3179@nagual.pp.ru> References: <200909040742.n847gD62058267@svn.freebsd.org> <20090904103214.GW2829@hoeg.nl> <20090904140219.GA3179@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--jtEtYGE75hrP1CgP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:32:14PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Even though I really appreciate fixes/cleanups to ee(1), I think changes > > like these should be sent to its maintainer as well. Have you done this? >=20 > Yes. Great! The reason why I was being a little negative, is because I noticed the previous version of ee(1) we had, had a lot of local patches that were very hard to merge. It turned out most of the features were implemented upstream as well, albeit differently. It's nice to see someone step up to hunt down bugs in ee(1). --=20 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> WWW: http://80386.nl/ --jtEtYGE75hrP1CgP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkqhKR0ACgkQ52SDGA2eCwVZ5ACZAXWTX+ktlwX/4OShk2wLa3jo VqkAn35yJA0ziVd8HgijjrTjMCOrt78t =/rA7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jtEtYGE75hrP1CgP--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090904145005.GX2829>