Date: Thu, 18 Dec 1997 14:44:30 -0700 (MST) From: Kenneth Merry <ken@plutotech.com> To: tlambert@primenet.com (Terry Lambert) Cc: ivt@gamma.ru, tlambert@primenet.com, mike@smith.net.au, sclawson@bottles.cs.utah.edu, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: blkfree: freeling free block/frag Message-ID: <199712182144.OAA27429@panzer.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: <199712182011.NAA13788@usr05.primenet.com> from Terry Lambert at "Dec 18, 97 08:11:14 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert wrote... > > Terry Lambert writes: > > > I do not believe this is a single bit error. I believe this is the same > > > problem I have been seeing. > > > > > > Does your ethernet hardware address begin with 00 00? > > > > news.gamma.ru (158.250.39.26) at 0:0:c0:a4:2e:61 > > Is there a problem with 0:0 ? > > Look at your corrupt variables and nearby variables in the stack, and > see if your ethernet address is being blown onto the stack somewhere. > > There is no problem with the 0:0, but it reinforces my feeling that > this could be resulting from a trashed kernel stack. I doubt that his ethernet address indicates any problems. 00:00:c0 is an SMC ethernet address prefix. I've got two SMC 10/100 cards in one of my systems, and a SMC Elite Ultra 16 (or something to that effect) in another system, and all of the ethernet addresses begin with 00:00:c0. Ken -- Kenneth Merry ken@plutotech.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199712182144.OAA27429>