Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 30 Mar 2000 09:29:52 -0500 (EST)
From:      Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Cc:        Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/include vmparam.h src/sys/conf opt 
Message-ID:  <200003301429.JAA91451@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20000330104700.44DEE1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au>
References:  <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> <200003300753.XAA68882@apollo.backplane.com> <20000330104700.44DEE1CD7@overcee.netplex.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 02:47:00 -0800, Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> said:
> No, the shared memory segments themselves, not the PV entries.  Presently
> the pages are wired directly into the processes that attach to them and
> they are not pageable.

Which means that this stuff should really be subject to the same
privilege and resource limits as mlock().

-GAWollman



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003301429.JAA91451>