Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:29:25 -0800 From: Greg Byshenk <freebsd@byshenk.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Daniel Kalchev <daniel@digsys.bg> Subject: Re: svn - but smaller? Message-ID: <20130125192925.GB2020@portland1.byshenk.net> In-Reply-To: <510284A3.8030509@digsys.bg> References: <20130123144050.GG51786@e-Gitt.NET> <87mww00w89.fsf@Shanna.FStaals.net> <20130123153724.GA79995@e-Gitt.NET> <510007F4.20701@sentex.net> <1358960762-2331017.37282719.fr0NH5PFb026896@rs149.luxsci.com> <CAGE5yCpGWiGpeJSJzJGq0SB74nJ-b%2BFEWgAM7b%2BXqK5u8HpEog@mail.gmail.com> <510284A3.8030509@digsys.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:12:03PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote: [...] > It is absurd to require the installation of any port, if your only > intention is to update the base system sources. I think others have already pointed this out, but "if your only intention is to update the base system sources", then 'freebsd-update' (from the base system) will do the job. Or am I missing/misunderstanding something? -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL - Portland, OR USA
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130125192925.GB2020>