Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 11:53:04 -0800 From: "SteveB" <admin@bsdfan.cncdsl.com> To: <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: Sitting on hands (no longer Re: FreeBSD vs Linux, Solaris, and NT) Message-ID: <NEBBIGOKKMNLOMOHMJNPIELGCNAA.admin@bsdfan.cncdsl.com> In-Reply-To: <200012211753.LAA28708@guild.plethora.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: seebs@plethora.net [mailto:seebs@plethora.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2000 9:54 AM > To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: Sitting on hands (no longer Re: FreeBSD vs > Linux, Solaris, > and NT) > > >In the open source > >world is there a official QA process or group. Is there a FreeBSD > >test suite that releases go through. QA is unglamorous work, but > >needs to be done. > > I don't know about the "official" process, but I will tell > you that I'd > rather have my life depend on FreeBSD-current than on > Windows NT, despite > the "QA cycle". > > There are many ways to do effective QA. > > -s > It would just make pitching FreeBSD and other open OS's in the enterprise a lot easier if there was an QA process that official releases went through. Also volunteering to QA would be a good training ground to gain familiarity with a OS and a chance to communicate with developers. Steve B. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?NEBBIGOKKMNLOMOHMJNPIELGCNAA.admin>