Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 17:40:05 +0800 From: Clive Lin <clive@tongi.org> To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/mutt Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <20020129094005.GA11322@malloc.eb.kliev.net> In-Reply-To: <20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com> References: <200201281806.g0SI6U989949@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020128181626.GA91155@malloc.eb.kliev.net> <20020128220136.GE49984@squall.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 05:01:37PM -0500, Will Andrews wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 02:16:26AM +0800, Clive Lin wrote: > > Since this port has a master in mail/mutt-devel, I have no idea > > how to deal with PORTREVISION. I know this MIGHT be solved by > > the =? trick, but at least it works if I simply ignore anything > > about PORTREVISION... (flame war coat on, and flee ~~~) > > What's wrong with letting PORTREVISION propagate if the port has > a master in mutt-devel? Seems like if the mutt port changes, so > should its slave. Yup, but if I want to make "slave port only" change, I have no quick knob for it ... This commit is a "slave port only" change. I've ever thought about how to represent this in PORTREVISION... but well, I choose to forget about it :-) - -- PGP key in header X-PGP-key. Mutt users simply do |gpg --verify would be fine. Win32 users please google for "pgp freeware." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8Vm3rdFUoBaAIwD4RAn+lAJ42FTAogvId4CmoM6NEWHWoYQFhtwCgilSG x4CKBjwxe81k35AE3a/lq/4= =rIJ4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020129094005.GA11322>