Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:53:52 +0200 From: Marcin Dalecki <mdcki@gmx.net> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: Freebsd Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Fixing -pthreads (Re: ports and -current) Message-ID: <3F714D90.6010002@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309231920460.24353-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10309231920460.24353-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eischen wrote: > Making -pthread a NOOP _would_ (*) break the application > in the link stage; it would be obvious when the application > failed to link with lots of unresolved pthread symbols. Yeah it would break. It would break in a way where the first thing I would suppose to be the case would be a problem with the compiler install instead of what it's supposed to tell me. I still stay by this: This is silly and annoying for someone not esp. interrested in all those wars about which thread lib is better then the other.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F714D90.6010002>