Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Nov 1999 07:05:17 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        Yoshinobu Inoue <shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Should jail treat ip-number? 
Message-ID:  <21882.942127517@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 09 Nov 1999 12:54:45 %2B0900." <19991109125445E.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19991109125445E.shin@nd.net.fujitsu.co.jp>, Yoshinobu Inoue writes:
>Hello,
>
>I have some concern about jail, and would like to discuss them.
>
>Currentlly jail set an ip-number and let prisoned processes
>only to bind it.
>My concerns are,
>
>(1)When IPv6 is added to the system, more general id would be
>   desirable.

I agree, *IF* IPv6 ever becomes a reality, we will look at this.

>(2)What is the goal of the restriction?

To isolate people in the jail from the "real" machine and from
other jails.

>   If physical level access protection is wanted,

it isn't.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?21882.942127517>