Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 12:53:59 -0600 From: "eBoundHost: Artur" <artur@eboundhost.com> To: "Jerry McAllister" <jerrymc@msu.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: who wrote this Message-ID: <000801c8305d$b446a6c0$6d00a8c0@mobility> References: <000801c82fa9$7c9ad700$6701a8c0@mobility> <20071126162053.GB71160@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <004901c8304d$85913440$6d00a8c0@mobility> <20071126172611.GE71160@gizmo.acns.msu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> So, I haven't yet thought of a good, adequately lean, but clarifying > phrase, > though if one comes to me I will submit it, but a clarifying phrase could > well be included and the hitler example remain with it because it > establishes > a very strong case-in-point example. How about something like this: http://www.freebsd.org/internal/fortunes.html =================== Examples of entries that should not usually be declared 'offensive': * Quotes from controversial historical figures, no matter how despicable they were. * Jokes about emacs/vi or your favorite technology, ........ =================== Or something along these lines. It gets the point accross better than "hitler quotes" and does not upset a segment of our users.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000801c8305d$b446a6c0$6d00a8c0>