Date: Wed, 21 Feb 1996 05:20:56 +1100 From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> To: darrenr@cyber.com.au, ulf@pbinet.com Cc: coredump@nervosa.com, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ide problems Message-ID: <199602201820.FAA02432@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> > > wd0: interrupt timeout: >> > > wd0: status 58<seekdone,drq> error 0 >> > > wd0: interrupt timeout: >> > > wd0: status 50<seekdone> error 1<no_dam> >> > > >> > > 2.1.0-RELEASE/Pentium-100 >This seems to be dependant on some option I've defined for the kernel. >I suspect "AUTO_EOI_1" and/or "AUTO_EOI_2". AUTO_EOI_2 problems usually cause interrupts 8-15 to stop working. If not using them makes a difference then it is probably a side effect of increasing the interrupt latency. Interrupt timeouts are normal if the drive goes into sleep mode. The kernel stops complaining after 5 of them. Bruce
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602201820.FAA02432>