Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Nov 1996 01:39:49 -0800 (PST)
From:      asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami)
To:        chuckr@glue.umd.edu
Cc:        FreeBSD-Ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: blt2.1
Message-ID:  <199611110939.BAA08673@baloon.mimi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.961110103315.17739A-100000@fiber.eng.umd.edu> (message from Chuck Robey on Sun, 10 Nov 1996 10:44:47 -0500 (EST))

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
 * Most people don't build packages, do they?  I mean, we could alter the
 * road from cleaned to to delivered package, without inconveniencing most
 * folks, right?

You are right.  I was thinking about another variable,
PACKAGE_BUILDING, that I (and anybody elso who builds packages) should 
set, which would then build the port with the "least common
denominator" (?) configuration you are talking about.

So, for this case, it should be something like:

.if defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
pre-patch:
	${CP} ${FILESDIR}/ignore-itcl-patch ${PATCHDIR}/patch-00
pre-clean:
	${RM} ${PATCHDIR}/patch-00
.endif

Makes sense?

Satoshi



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611110939.BAA08673>