Date: Mon, 13 May 1996 18:34:14 +0000 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu> Cc: FreeBSD-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PHK malloc Message-ID: <244.832012454@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 13 May 1996 12:25:50 -0400." <Pine.OSF.3.91.960513122423.3531A-100000@ginger.eng.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I was looking at the code for ld.so, and I noticed that it carries it's > own version of malloc with it. How come Poul's malloc isn't used for the > run time loader? I have thought about it, but decided that it would take an actual move of malloc into ld.so if it were to make sense, and >that< didn't I concluded. I'd be happy if you prove me wrong :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?244.832012454>