Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 15:56:37 -0500 From: Louis LeBlanc <FreeBSD@keyslapper.org> To: FreeBSD-Questions Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SpamAssassin-Milter accuracy... Message-ID: <20050103205637.GB76250@keyslapper.org> In-Reply-To: <72cf361e05010312346cabce01@mail.gmail.com> References: <3A426BB0-5DB0-11D9-B56F-000D9333E43C@secure-computing.net> <72cf361e05010312346cabce01@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/03/05 08:34 PM, Martin Hepworth sat at the `puter and typed: > Eric > > you'll prob need to retrain the bayes filters ( or a good starter at > www.fsl.com/support). > > also alot of rules from the www.rulesemporium.com/rules.html can be useful. I believe that's actually www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm - the .html is 404. > Might want to look at some of the RBL.s and esp the URI rbl provided > by surbl.org and built into SA3.x Use with care. Some spam rbls are overly zealous, and often block out whole netblocks just because one IP has been reported as an offender. > Could ask on the sa-user list.... You have to subscribe - the list is now closed because the nature of the traffic necessitates piping the list mail around SA. Because of this, spammers always knew they could get by spamassassin by sending to the list. > and backup the config:-) Definitely. And you might also want to keep a spam "sampler" around for just such a case. This can be used to get your bayes learner back up to speed a little quicker. IIRC, the bayes learner needs a minimum number of messages to learn from before it will kick in and start working. Lou -- Louis LeBlanc FreeBSD@keyslapper.org Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :) http://www.keyslapper.org ԿԬ Hlade's Law: If you have a difficult task, give it to a lazy person -- they will find an easier way to do it.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050103205637.GB76250>