Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 12:06:33 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Mohan Srinivasan <mohan_srinivasan@yahoo.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Processes stuck in nfsreq Message-ID: <20041225200633.GC56931@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041225173524.33634.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20041225070022.GA93123@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041225173524.33634.qmail@web80606.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 09:35:24AM -0800, Mohan Srinivasan wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> If the box is still in that state, can you force a core ?
>=20
> The trace below shows the process blocked on nfs_request()->msleep.
> If the process shows up as waiting on "nfsreq", it would be msleep'ing
> from nfs_reply(), not from nfs_request(). There's only one msleep()
> call in nfs_request() (nfs_socket.c:1125), but that is for "nqnfstry".
> The msleep("nfsreq") only happens from nfs_reply() (unless nfs_reply()=20
> has gotten inlined).
It's possible the sleep channel was something else, I transcribed that
from memory because by that time I couldn't get back in to the box to
do anything.
Kris
--+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFBzchIWry0BWjoQKURAhSvAJ9VWFF1Jca520VJE3EGMoOfNPrznQCgp7XI
SqzEM9q36F3nWOk3lcc8pZI=
=0Wzg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--+xNpyl7Qekk2NvDX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041225200633.GC56931>