Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 10:50:34 -0500 (EST) From: Sujal Patel <smpatel@wam.umd.edu> To: willows@throck.com, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: More on x86 Emulated Willows Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960207104503.197j-100000@xi.dorm.umd.edu>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I found out this morning that, a static 'xwin' binary is MUCH more succesful then the dynamic one. The static one runs charmap, terminal, clock, and even gets much farther on WinWord.. Anyone have any idea what could be causing this? Current problems are: 1- Calc, Excel, and others FPE in fp87.c-- This bug is FreeBSD specific(?) 2- WinWord complains about SHARE.EXE not being loaded... Any ideas? Sujal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960207104503.197j-100000>