Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      08 Dec 1999 03:43:58 -0500
From:      root@ihack.net (Charles M. Hannum)
To:        Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
Cc:        Lord Isildur <isildur@guild.net>, Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, alpha@FreeBSD.ORG, port-alpha@netbsd.org
Subject:   Re: Q: Compaq, *BSD and 'Linux-only' AlphaBIOS (fwd)
Message-ID:  <el2vh692569.fsf@eniwetok.ihack.net>
In-Reply-To: Andrew Gallatin's message of "Fri,  3 Dec 1999 20:58:24 -0500 (EST)"
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.05.9912031321060.12054-100000@semuta.feral.com> 	<Pine.LNX.3.96.991203174831.3171A-100000@guild.net> <14408.29267.776501.133049@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> writes:

> The only problem with this argument is there are a few machines that
> nobody ever made SRM for.  Like the XL266 and the 300XL.  They don't
> trouble us because we don't have them.  But we don't have them because 
> they don't run BSD.

According to Jim Paradis, SRM exists for all boards produced by
Digital.  It's what Digital/Compaq uses to test the boards in-house.
They simply didn't release it for some models, due to the flarghing NT
licensing crap.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?el2vh692569.fsf>